The HTC Rhyme

The HTC Rhyme is something of a delicate matter, as it is HTC's firstphone that is said to have been designed with a female audience in mind. Yet it comes in dull colours and looks quite a lot like every other HTC handset we’ve seen so far.

PENTAX Q-REVIEW

Let’s get one thing straight from the start. The Pentax Q is quite an incredible camera to behold. It’s tiny. But not only is it tiny, it also looks great.

NIKON 1 V1

Nikon has announced two new compact system cameras: the Nikon 1 V1 and the Nikon 1 J1. We got our hands on both new cameras today, so until we can bring you our Nikon 1 V1 review

The ULTra Personal Rapid Transit System

"Think of it as a horizontal lift," says Fraser Brown, managing director of ULTra, the company that has built a new way to travel to Heathrow Terminal 5 from the business car park

THREE MIFI HSPA

Three has updated its MiFi range with the new Huawei E586 complete with HSPA+, and we have managed to get our hands on one to test out all its mobile internet goodness

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Bin Laden's money trail

Bin Laden's money trail

by Tim Wall at 03/05/2011 20:51

Follow the money, they say, and you’ll solve the crime.

But in the case of Osama bin Laden, the late and unlamented al-Qaeda terrorist leader, the money trail actually leads in a very embarrassing direction for the people who killed him: the US government.

This is no wild conspiracy theory: sadly, it’s just documented fact.

In the 1980s Bin Laden’s mujahedeen group fighting Soviet forces in Afghanistan was just one of dozens that received hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars from the CIA (and funds from the Saudi regime). The Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI – a faction of which is widely suspected of harbouring Bin Laden over the last few years – received (and still receives) even more.

After the US posted troops on Saudi Arabian soil in the first Gulf War, Bin Laden became a “Frankenstein’s Monster” who turned on his former paymasters.

And since the terror attacks on the United States on 9/11, the money trail now leads in the same direction: the “War on Terror” has been responsible for an explosion in US spending on wars, weapons, security and personnel – at the expense of public services, health, education and social security.

As CNN detailed in a report this week after Bin Laden’s killing, the so-called “War on Terror” has led the US government to spend “hundreds of billions of dollars with the aim of making Americans feel safer”.

Since 9/11, the US Department of Homeland Security has spent $424 billion, according to CNN, while the budget of the Defence Department for 2010 alone was close to $700 billion.

Today, the US federal budget deficit stands at $14 trillion and rising, due in big part to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (and bailing out Wall Street since the 2008 crisis, of course).

So if we ask “Cui bono?” from al-Qaeda and Bin Laden, the most obvious answer is the US security services and military-industrial complex – who, er, bankrolled him in the first place.

In this light, Bin Laden’s killing takes on a different meaning. Perhaps Barack Obama and his advisers took the view that the “War on Terror” inherited from Bush is costing way too much, and the project needs to be finally shut down – before it bankrupts America (and the rest of the world).

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Bin Laden sacrificed to keep fanning flames of war

Bin Laden sacrificed to keep fanning flames of war

The death of Osama Bin Laden may have been praised around the world, but that world is now bracing itself for a terrorist response, and while the symbol of America’s War on Terror seems to be done with, the actual war on terror is not.

­The great vendetta moment was shrouded in secrecy. As Americans celebrated the killing of the nation’s number one terrorist, they had no other proof of his death but the word of their president.

Meanwhile, the news that the body of the Al-Qaeda leader was buried at sea is doing little to counter claims that he is still alive.

“They needed to give us a big win, that we can walk tall and feel good but, ‘Sorry – cannot see his body, we threw it in the ocean. Oh, we did show you a fake photo!’” mocks radio host Alex Jones.

­“We must remain vigilant”

­According to US officials, American Navy Seals killed Osama Bin Laden in his mansion in Pakistan, conducted a DNA test to make sure it was him and promptly got rid of the body, as they put it, following Islamic burial tradition.

The aim of the operation may have been as much to do with winning elections, as the war on terror.

“Yet his death does not mark the end of our effort. There's no doubt that Al-Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must, and we will, remain vigilant at home and abroad,” Barack Obama declared.

The US has long been chasing Al-Qaeda beyond Afghanistan’s borders.

There have been “covert” drone strikes in Pakistan and in Yemen, which were actually quite overt and widely criticized for the scores of civilians killed in the attacks.

The question some ask now is: could the success of killing Bin Laden in Pakistan give the US carte blanche to carry out strikes in other countries?

“They will be used to justify further wars, greater repression at home and more extra-jurisdiction targeted assassinations against political opponents and this is true whether in Libya. In Iraq, in Pakistan and Afghanistan,” predicts author and anti-war activist Sara Flounders.

Many analysts say America’s war on terror so far has been a double edged sword that involves fighting terror and provoking terror at the same time.

The war waged by allied forces and led by the United States, has left Afghanistan as unstable as ever.

“The War on Terror has the ability to allow the US to carry out military operations that since 2001 have taken lives of more than a million civilians in Iraq, in Afghanistan, now in Libya and of course that leads to an escalation of resistance, of hatred and revenge, and so in terms of keeping the Americans safe – that’s a ridiculous notion,”
reveals Brian Becker, national co-coordinator of the Answer Coalition.

­9/11 as collateral damage

­The US has a track record of policies that backfired, like arming and training the Afghan Mujahideen in the 1980s in their fight against Soviet troops. Subsequently the same Mujahideen militants turned their weapons and training against the US.

Among those supported by the US was Osama Bin

Condemns-operation-musharraf-laden-252_n
 Laden. whose group eventually evolved into Al-Qaeda.

“One great problem with the whole episode in Afghanistan in 1980s is that no lessons were learnt. Still seen by the CIA as a great success with a bit of a collateral damage in New York, which was the 9/11 [attacks],” Professor Mark Almond of Bilkent University shared his analysis.

But one lesson was learnt: victory over “evil” makes great television and approval ratings for the man in charge.

Obama said that he had known about Bin Laden’s whereabouts since August last year, but only last week had he given the order to have him taken out.

­Elections round the corner

­It has been two weeks since Obama announced his re-election plans. He has been slipping in the polls over inconclusive wars overseas and economic woes at home.

“Obama is cashing in on this for everything that it’s worth. In his speech last night he kept stressing several times, ‘I ordered, I promised, I such and such.’ This statement was clearly worded for political advantage,” concludes filmmaker Danny Schehter.

At a time of unity and joy over the death of the evil Osama, Americans could be missing the bigger picture: in the last ten years the War on Terror, and the way it has been conducted, has earned them more enemies than friends.

­American investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill says Bin Laden may be not alive, but his agenda of trying to chisel away American power in the world will certainly live on. In a certain way, Bin Laden won, making the US spend over a trillion dollars on wars over the last ten years, invading Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and had actually been an enemy of Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda under Saddam Hussein.

“In doing so [the US] created or inspired a whole generation of people to rise up against the US, that probably would not be inclined to do [so] otherwise,” Scahill said.

Daughter: Bin Laden captured alive, executed later

Daughter: Bin Laden captured alive, executed later

AFP Photo / Arif Ali

AFP Photo / Arif Ali

 

Osama Bin Laden’s daughter claimed her father was captured alive by US forces and then later executed in front of her.

Al-Arabiya, citing Pakistani security officials, reported that the 12-year-old daughter of Bin Laden saw her father executed after capture and drug aboard a helicopter.

The official allegedly rejected any notion a firefight took place.

Not a single bullet was fired from the compound at the US forces and their choppers. Their chopper developed some technical fault and crashed and the wreckage was left on the spot,” the official told Al-Arabiya.

The White House has already changed its story a number of times. It was revealed that Bin Laden did not use one of his wives as a human shield, after the administration initially claimed he had and it was also later learned the al-Qaeda leader was shot while unarmed. Previously it had been reported that he resisted and was armed with a rifle.

The Obama administrations response following the mix up was to clarify that Bin Laden resisted and that resistance did not require he be armed.

US Fox News has also reported that Bin Laden was in possession of large amounts of cash and phone numbers, leading many to believe he was getting ready to flee the home or was prepared in the event he was forced to leave quickly.

On top of these revelations the National Enquirer claimed in a report that the man pleaded for his life and told US forces “it’s not me.”

Security officials apparently did not recover any arms or explosives following an all-encompassing search of the compound. They did however remove two buffalos, a cow and roughly 150 chickens in addition to computer hard drives, DVDs and an array of documents.

According to the Pentagon it was also in the plan for the US forces to remove and take Bin Laden’s family with them when they left the compound. But, the failure of one of the helicopters forced them to scrub that part of the plan.

The mix of stories and lack of tangible evidence of what actually occurred has left many angry and confused.

An Islamist group in Pakistan took to the streets in protest, yelling, “Down with America! Down with Obama!” and “Jihad, Jihad the only treatment for America.”

Let me make it very clear that we will avenge the martyrdom of Osama bin Laden, and we will do it by carrying out attacks in Pakistan and America. We will teach them an exemplary lesson,” said Pakistani Taliban spokesman Ahsanullah Ahsan.

A British bishop has also blasted the acts of the US, arguing the incident was more about revenge than justice.

The more I consider it the more concerning I find it. The thing that troubles me most is the way some are speaking of justice being done,” said Rt. Rev. Michael Scott-Joynt, the Bishop of Winchester. “What has actually happened, only too sadly understandably, is, I think, much more reasonably viewed as an act of vengeance or revenge.”

 

via rt

Engage with Purpose Brian Solis

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More